15 Famous People of the Past Whose Depictions Prove That Photoshop Existed, Even in the Nineteenth Century

Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.

At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.

Isabella II of Spain (1830 — 1904)

Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 — 1953)

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 — 2002)

Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 — 1923)

Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 — 1901)

Charlotte of Belgium (1840 — 1927)

Sophie of Württemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 — 1877)

Queen Victoria (1819 — 1901)

Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 — 1929)

Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 — 1899)

Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 — 1957)

Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 — 1944)

Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 — 1918)

Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 — 1969)

Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 — 1925)

onus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 — 1890)

What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.

My Ex-husband Surprised Me with a Trip Invitation – When We Returned, My Life Was Completely Transformed

Ashley’s journey is a testament to resilience, self-worth, and the strength it takes to reclaim one’s life after betrayal. Her story powerfully illustrates how deception and misplaced trust can lead to a painful reckoning, yet it also reveals the quiet courage required to break free from a toxic cycle and put one’s own dignity first.

Ashley didn’t fall back into Jeremy’s grasp after his betrayal; instead, she chose her self-respect and her children’s well-being over a house that had come to represent a twisted symbol of betrayal. Camille’s desperate attempt to manipulate Jeremy and possess Ashley’s life ultimately crumbled, a fitting end to her malicious scheme. And Jeremy’s brief moment of regret came too late, as his choices had already fractured any remaining trust.

If I were in Ashley’s shoes, the hardest yet most empowering decision would likely be the same—walking away, even when the heart wants to cling to what was once a cherished life. She’s a true example of strength in the face of loss, redefining her home as a place of love and honesty, free from deceit and manipulation. What a powerful reminder that sometimes, letting go is the only path forward.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*