We all have about 22,000 genes and sometimes we share enough genes with our family to be an almost identical copy of them. Although there may be 50 years between the 2 photos, their faces look the same thanks to the magic of these genes. There are some people who are carbon copies of their relatives, confirmed by their photos that simply blow us away.
Bright Side would like to share with you just how cool our genes can be with some exceptional photos we found.
1. “My mom and sister, both at age 6”
2. “My mom (left) age 4 in 1971. Me (right) age 4 in 2001. I see why people say we look alike.”
3. Grandmother 1941 and granddaughter 1999, same genes
4. “Me, 1992. Mom, 1954.”
5. “Here’s me and my fraternal twin.”
6. “Me on the left (circa ’90s, Canada) and my grand-dad (circa ’40s, Ireland).”
7. “My old man and me at the same age, 35 years apart.”
8. “Me in 1971 and my son in 1994”
9. “My mother at age 21 (L) and me at age 27.”
10. “My father, age 24 in 1951. And 24-year-old me.”
11. “I always knew that my mom and sister looked alike, but seeing them side by side is uncanny.”
12. “My brother (2016) and my grandfather (1948)”
13. “I’ve been told a lot that I look like my Finnish grandma.”
14. “My dad 1958… Me 1988.”
15. “Side-by-side comparison of my identical twin and me.”
Who do you look most like in your family? Share a photo of someone you look like so that we can compare!
Campbell’s Soup: A Tale of Survival Amidst a Changing Market Landscape
The well-known American company Campbell’s Soup, which has endured for almost 200 years, is dealing with serious issues that might force it to close.
The corporation is battling a changing customer trend that deviates from Campbell’s traditionally processed offerings and supports natural and unprocessed food options. Campbell’s bought a number of businesses in an effort to meet the evolving needs of its customers, but regrettably, this action left the company deeply in debt—nearly $9 billion.
In addition to contending with growing debt and shifting market conditions, Campbell’s is also facing internal conflict among its key stockholders. There is a power struggle between the Dorrance family, who own a substantial 40% of Campbell’s shares, and Daniel Loeb, the hedge fund manager of Third Point, who holds about 7% of the company’s stock. Loeb has been pushing for radical changes within the organization, including as rebranding campaigns that might even modify the iconic red and white Campbell’s Soup cans. The Dorrance family, however, objected to this suggested change, which is why Loeb sued the business for purported mismanagement.
There has been movement in the direction of resolution and transformation notwithstanding this tension. Although Campbell’s has criticized Loeb’s claims, both parties have decided to add two of Third Point’s recommended directors to the company’s board. This suggests that additional changes may be in store as Campbell’s works to preserve its existence.
The loyal customer base of Campbell’s Soup stands to lose a great deal from the possible shutdown of the company, which also represents broader trends in consumer choice shifting. While industry watchers regard the shutdown as another example of consumers turning away from processed goods, devoted Campbell’s fans would view it as a significant loss. The organization will need to embrace adaptation and make significant changes to its business model in order to weather this storm and remain relevant in a market that is changing quickly.
In addition to determining Campbell’s own destiny, its actions during this volatile time will offer important insights into how well-known businesses can adjust to shifting customer trends and tastes. Campbell’s story will be used as a case study by companies trying to find a way to embrace change while holding onto tradition.
Leave a Reply