A medical surgeon gained international recognition by sharing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) footage that showed how a patient’s injected hyaluronic acid fillers developed and moved on their own over time. Thousands of viewers were shocked by the results and acknowledged that their implanted fillers had never dissolved.
Dermal fillers are defined by the American Board of Cosmetic Surgery as gel-like substances that are injected into the skin to improve facial features, smooth wrinkles and soften creases, and restore lost volume. According to the American Board of Cosmetic Surgery, dermal fillers are substances that resemble gel and are injected into the skin to enhance facial features, soften creases, smooth wrinkles, and replenish lost volume.
According to the board, more than a million men and women select this well-liked face rejuvenation procedure annually. Hyaluronic acid is a common injectable filler kind that is also the most temporary. Usually, hyaluronic acid fillings last six to eighteen months. Oculoplastic surgeon Dr. Kami Parsa gained notoriety after posting an MRI video online. On Friday, July 12, Dr. Kami Parsa, an oculoplastic surgeon from Beverly Hills, California, posted a video of an MRI of a patient on his TikTok profile.
The movie demonstrated how the injections had changed the patient’s face. Over the preceding six years, the patient, a 33-year-old woman, had received more than 12 CC, or 12 milliliters, of hyaluronic acid filler injections. The movie’s MRI, which has received over 7.2 million views, showed a grey face with green dots lighting up in different spots, such as the cheeks and lips, to show where the remaining hyaluronic acid filler was.
The patient’s procedures were not disclosed by Dr. Parsa. He did, however, confirm that the material equaled 28 CC after doing a volumetric assessment to ascertain the woman’s filler amount. In the video, the physician said, “which is more than twice the amount of filler that was injected.” “This proves that hyaluronic acid fillers are hydrophilic,” he went on.
This indicates that they both enjoy being in water and stimulate tissue growth. An individual on TikTok expressed concern over the MRI, saying, “I just don’t see how this wouldn’t completely destroy the lymphatic system.” Someone wrote, “Finally, THIS IS BEING TALKED ABOUT.” “Mass production and impulsive, insane use.” I must find out more.How about botox? “Botox has a long history and is safe if performed correctly,” was the response from Dr. Parsa. The patient’s hyaluronic acid filler dosage has increased, as shown by the MRI.
Archaeologists Believe They Have Found Noah’s Ark
One of the longest-standing questions in biblical archaeology is the whereabouts of Noah’s Ark’s remnants. A massive wooden vessel known as Noah’s Ark, according to the Bible, protected Noah, his family, and pairs of every animal species from a devastating deluge that inundated the Earth approximately 5,000 years ago. Even while this myth has long been central to many theological ideologies, it has been difficult to use scientific evidence to support its historicity. Archaeologists believe they are now one step closer to confirming the resting place of Noah’s Ark, but recent discoveries have given new life to this ancient search.
This archaeological study has its core in Turkey, more precisely in the Doğubayazıt area of Ağrı, where a mysterious geological structure that resembles a boat-shaped mound has been studied since 1956. This location is consistent with the biblical story that the Ark landed on the “mountains of Ararat” in Turkey after a 150-day flood wiped out all life on Earth. With its impressive 16,500 feet of elevation, the mountain itself is shaped like an ark.
A group of specialists from Istanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Andrew University, and Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (AİÇÜ) headed the expedition, which started in 2021 and is still going strong. The main objective of the research is to examine soil and rock samples taken from the location in an effort to find solid proof that could support the presence of Noah’s Ark.
The team took thirty samples of rock and soil fragments from the location in December 2022, and the samples were examined at the ITU laboratory. Researchers are really excited by the preliminary findings. The samples included residues of seafood along with clayey and marine elements. The findings, researchers say, clearly point to human activity at the boat-shaped mound between 3000 and 5500 BC.
Because it closely corresponds with the biblical timeline of the Great Flood, which occurred approximately 5,000 years ago, dating human activity to this era is extremely significant. To be sure that Noah’s Ark is present at this location, further thorough investigation and study are nevertheless required, according to the researchers, who are nevertheless wary.
In response to the results, AİÇÜ Vice Rector Professor Faruk Kaya said, “The initial results of the investigations indicate that human activity has been in the area since the Chalcolithic era, which occurred between 5500 and 3000 BC. We know that Prophet Noah’s flood occurred 5,000 years ago. It is also said that there was life in this area when it comes to dating. The outcomes of the lab tests demonstrated this. With the dating, it is impossible to claim that the ship is here. To make this clear, we must work for a very long time.
Although these results are fascinating, it’s important to remember that they don’t offer solid proof of Noah’s Ark’s presence. Recognizing that there is skepticism surrounding this quest, the experts on the expedition are dedicated to carrying out rigorous and exhaustive scientific examinations in order to completely validate their findings.
The geological past of Mount Ararat is one area of disagreement in the discussion of the Ark’s location. Young Earth creationist Dr. Andrew Snelling, who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Sydney, has contended that Mount Ararat cannot be the location of the Ark because the mountain formed after the floodwaters subsided. The complexity of the Noah’s Ark story and the variety of viewpoints that surround it are shown by this divergence in interpretation.
Finding Noah’s Ark is still a difficult and controversial task in the field of biblical archaeology. Some view the story skeptically, focusing on the symbolic and metaphorical elements found in religious scriptures, while others continue to ponder the alluring prospect of finding one of history’s most famous boats.
The search to verify the presence of Noah’s Ark is evidence of humanity’s never-ending curiosity with solving the secrets of our history, regardless of the conclusion of this continuous archaeological inquiry. It serves as a reminder that, despite obstacles posed by science, the quest for knowledge and comprehension is nonetheless fundamental to the human experience.
In conclusion, we are getting closer to maybe verifying the presence of Noah’s Ark thanks to the archeological dig in Turkey. By analyzing soil and rock samples, scientists have found evidence of human habitation from a time closely linked to the biblical story of the Great Flood. To be clear, more research is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Noah’s Ark was present at this location. Nevertheless, it is imperative to embrace these discoveries with cautious hope. No matter what happens, this search is a prime example of how humans have always been fascinated by solving old mysteries and examining the nexus between faith, history, and science.
Leave a Reply